Blog

News

What Color Pen Can I Use to Sign Documents?

August 14th, 2014 by

Ink Color for Signing DocumentsNot sure which pen to use? Although it seems like an amusing topic, your choice of writing utensil actually does make a difference when you’re dealing with FDA documentation.

There’s obviously a good reason why you can’t sign a form in pencil, but the rules aren’t always so clear on what it takes to create a valid official signature. Understanding the guidelines surrounding document verification and IT record-keeping implementations, however, might make it a bit easier to institute an appropriate corporate standard.

A History of Questions about FDA Rules

A cursory examination of online compliance forums indicates plenty of conflicting opinions and outright rumors about document signing. For instance, some people believe that blue pen is the only acceptable medium for document signing because it permits regulators to distinguish original signatures from printed replicas.

Other individuals, however, contest that blue isn’t allowed precisely because it fails to produce photocopies reliably. Similarly, firms wonder whether gel pens and water-soluble inks are appropriate and if their validation document submissions even require wet signatures.

Sound confusing? Fortunately, the FDA has released some specific guidelines about digital and hard-copy document signing. For instance, the FDA accepts scanned, digital and flattened digital signatures as being equally valid in some ways, but they may not all be equally appropriate in every situation.

In short, while your firm’s implementation of signing standards or adoption of specific ink colors aren’t likely to lead to rejections, but signatures that appear questionable or hard to verify can definitely cause trouble. What’s really important is how well your signatures support the assertion that your records are indeed what they seem.

Clarifying the Signature Issue

The FDA recommends that firms talk to FDA Center personnel to find out which kind of signature is appropriate before submitting a document. It’s also worth noting that different kinds of center-specific submissions are bound by individual preparation guidelines.

Signature rules may be uniquely affected by the nature of the submission in question. Just as with software validation, general guidelines don’t always pass muster when it comes to maintaining compliance.

Creating a Reliable Signature System

In addition to following the FDA’s basic rules about digital and wet signatures, many firms supplement their signing procedures with additional documentation. Even though the agency doesn’t typically check electronic or paper signatures without an identified need, for instance, GxP companies are advised to maintain security certificates and other verification information just in case they’re necessary during subsequent inspections.

The agency’s guidelines also detail how documents and submissions should be handled. 21 CFR Part 312, for instance, maintains that investigators are to retain records for two years after the approval or disapproval of drug marketing applications and makes note of the need for dated signatures on medical reports and drug trial consent forms.

Such third-party signatures may not necessarily mimic the same institutional signing standards you have in place within your organization, but standardizing them could make things a lot easier. Whether you’re choosing record-keeping software for your FDA Part 11 compliance efforts or simply working with a new partner, it’s wise to talk with a consultant who can tell you how you’ll need to modify your document signing procedures to ensure smooth submissions and less painful inspections.

GxP-CC consults with firms to ensure all details are correctly interpreted to maintain compliance with regulations and guidelines. Contact them today to find out how they can assist you in your efforts.

About this author:

Avatar

For over 15 years Mr. Francum has worked in regulated environments directing and orchestrating the various components involved in assuring compliance of the most stringent regulatory requirements. He is an internationally recognized expert and has extensive experience in over 25 countries including, but not limited to, the regions of North America, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*